Monday, February 2, 2015

Linguistic Autobiography Guidelines to Support Rubric


Linguistic Autobiography/Linguistic Family History


This assignment will give you the opportunity to reflect on the many factors that have influenced your language(s) and how your language has influenced you. You will be thinking and writing about the role of language in your life and the relationship of language to your identity, language acquisition theories, and language policies in the US. Or, if you are writing your linguistic family history, you will be reflecting on how a variety of languages and/or dialects have been used, retained or lost over the decades in your family. Note: Students may choose to focus on their own language learning history, or they may focus on their family's linguistic history, but either choice should include at least some description of their own experiences with learning another language in school or at university.

Use the dimensions of the rubric:

(1) Thoroughly describes extended family’s linguistic history or own linguistic autobiography.
  Briefly tell your “linguistic” story. 

(2) Successfully connects linguistic family history or own linguistic autobiography with first and second language acquisition theories, sociolinguistics, etc.
Consider using the text and other handouts on L1 and L2 acquisition and language variations (sociolinguistics). 

(3) Adequately describes the historical perspective and the implications of language- related policy issues to family history or own linguistic autobiography.
Explore http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/plc/clpp/ on language policy issues. For example, is there an English-only policy in the United States? Did your family members receive any ESL instruction, or were they just immersed in English when they arrived in America?

(4) Adequately describes how cultural groups and one’s cultural identity may affect language learning and school achievement.

Some possible questions to get you started:

What languages and/or dialects do you speak?
How does your language reflect your upbringing?
What has influenced your language? 
What kind of differences do you notice between the way you speak and write? 
When, if ever, do you alter your speech and why?
Do you have childhood memories that revolve around language?
How is language used in your family?
In what ways do you see your language as part of your identity? 
What sort of language was spoken in your neighborhood?
What other languages have you studied?
What other languages have you used for communication?
What dialect did your parents speak?
What are your family's attitudes about language?

Do any members of your family come from a foreign-language background?

Friday, January 30, 2015

Comprehensive Linguistic Analysis

EDU 540: Comprehensive Linguistic Analysis

This is a project that will entail a comprehensive linguistic analysis of a five-minute long, videotaped and transcribed segment of a selected television program or movie that involves a nonnative speaker of English.

In this assignment you are expected to meet the following course objectives:
(a) use the terminology employed in linguistics appropriately,
(b) examine the way languages are structured and used (English and the other language), 
(c) explain observations about the English language using linguistic categories and principles, (d) practice the basic skills of linguistic analysis through independent field work, and
(e) apply linguistic concepts and knowledge to the ESL classroom.

The purposes of this assignment also include (a) raising your awareness to the varieties of English that surround us,  (b) sensitizing you—the ESL teacher—to the complexity of the task confronting the English Language Learner when communicating in English, and (c) developing a better understanding of cross-cultural communication.

STEPS TO FOLLOW:
I.   Data Collection
Videotape a TV program or use a selection from a movie that depicts a situation (preferably a family situation that includes children, for variety of speech patterns) involving a nonnative speaker of English and has a cross-linguistic and cross-cultural dimension. The situation must represent differences between English and other real languages (as opposed to a language made up for the movie).

II.  Transcription
Transcribe approximately five minutes of the show. Make sure you include talk-overs, incomplete utterances, interruptions, laughter, etc. Include as much as possible from the actual speech performance. You may take samples from different segments of the program to illustrate unusual usage.
You may use Gail Jefferson’s transcription system (available on our Lion’s Den course website) to analyze your text. Attach the transcript to your paper in an appendix. Please save the videotape until the end of the course.

III. Description and Analysis
A.   Background: Provide some background about your sample (title, genre, setting of the program, characters, situation, etc.).
  1. Analysis and Contrasts: Analyze your sample for differences in language between your taped sample and what you would consider Standard English (what is usually found in an academic setting).  Be certain to look at least five of the following seven categories:
    1. Fast colloquial speech, nonstandard pronunciation, unusual use of prosodic devices (the patterns of stress and intonation in a language)… (PHONOLOGY)
    2. Unusual word formations, nonstandard inflections … (MORPHOLOGY)
    3. Nonstandard syntactic features, fragments, word order… (SYNTAX)
    4. Idiomatic expressions, word choice, unusual words… (SEMANTICS)
    5. Maxims of conversations, politeness, speech acts …(PRAGMATICS)
    6. Language variations (regional, social, gender, stylistic), register, slang expressions …(SOCIOLINGUISTICS)
    7. Language transfer problems… (SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION)
    8.  

Include a total of 10-15 examples (at least 2 examples per areas listed above) from your taped and transcribed sample and analyze how they differ from standard discourse. In other words, what linguistic problems are faced by the interlocutors? What misunderstandings are caused by their linguistic and cultural differences?  Use your textbook and class notes extensively. 
IV. Discussion and Conclusions
Discuss your findings in light of the task facing ELLs.
Q1 -- What can help them overcome the difficulties the actor “ELLs” faced in the conversation?     Q2 -- Can TV and other media be used to help them?
Q3 -- What kind of remediation would you plan for them?
V.  Make sure you follow the 6th edition of the APA manual. References should include your textbook, the film or TV show, and any other materials that you use.


Length of assignment: minimum 2,750 word  ||  maximum      3,000 words

Sunday, January 4, 2015

EDU 540 02 Elicitation Project CHECKLIST (25%)

Elicitation Project (25 points)

Group Answers (21 points)
1.   Phonological Findings (4 points)
       What phonological differences did you notice between the language you studied and English? Were there any unfamiliar vowel sounds? Were there any unfamiliar consonant clusters? What did you notice about the intonation or rhythm of the language? Was there vowel harmony?
2.    Morphological and Syntactical Findings (4 points)
         What morphological differences did you notice between the language you studied and English? Were there any inflectional endings (such as  for the plural, past tense, or possessive)? What word order is used in the target language (subject-verb-object, subject-object verb, and so on)?
3.     Writing System Findings (2  points)
         What did you learn about the writing system?
4.    Nonverbal Behavior  (4 points)
         What did you learn about nonverbal behavior in the target culture?  Are the emblems similar? What are other features of their nonverbal behavior, e.g. proxemics, eye contact, and so on?
5.  Culture, Greetings, Number Systems, and Other Information (4 points)
      What did you learn about the target culture? Which greetings did you learn? Does the target culture use a number system similar to ours? What other information did you elicit?
6. Provide the list of lexical items that you collected. (3 points)

Individual Reflection (4 points)
Write a reflection on the experience of elicitation. Discuss the value of such a project and any implications it may have for teaching English language learners. (300-word minimum)

EDU 540 02 SYLLABUS

MOLLOY COLLEGE
GRADUATE EDUCATION
Spring 2015
Faith Tripp                                                                                        Email: ftripp@molloy.edu
Office Hours: by appointment or
Phone number: 917-579-8789

EDU 540:  INTRODUCTION TO LINGUISTICS FOR TESOL PROFESSIONALS 
(3 credits)

Catalogue Description


This course will provide an introduction to the scientific study of language, with a specific emphasis on areas relevant for TESOL professionals. These areas will include phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. Topics in linguistics related to issues of first and second language acquisition, and language development and teaching will receive special emphasis. Theoretical and applied linguistic issues will be discussed through the analysis of English language output.

Teacher candidates will have the opportunity to identify core elements of selected linguistic theories, to describe common components of selected language systems, and to relate this knowledge to the linguistic characteristics they encounter in the second language classroom. Thus, this course will benefit the TESOL teacher candidates (a) on the theoretical level, by providing knowledge and skills for analyzing linguistic data, and (b) at the practical level, by providing explanations for the specific linguistic phenomena observed. It will also serve as a foundation for further study in the theoretical and practical aspects of language teaching as well as a catalyst for developing acceptance of linguistic diversity.  
Field Component: Collection and analysis of linguistic data for homework and in-class projects will be required. 

Shared Vision: 
The teaching professionals, both undergraduate and graduate teacher candidates, who complete Molloy’s teacher preparation programs are distinguished by their ability to exemplify and promote core values in their own teaching. These values include: 
Belief that all children can learn
Learner centered and value-centered curriculum and pedagogy
Ethics and spirituality
Intellectual curiosity
Independence and risk taking, while promoting collective identity and responsibility
Diversity, multiculturalism and pluralism, including divergent thinking
Passion for teaching
Commitment to students and their communities
Civic responsibility through the promotion of social justice and interdependence
Commitment to democracy

Course Objectives:


Teacher candidates will: 
1.              become familiar with the core areas of linguistic studies—phonology, morphology,
            syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics;

2.              recognize the fundamental theoretical aspects of selected subfields of linguistics;

3.              outline the role of selected linguistic subfields in everyday life;

4.              use the terminology employed in linguistics appropriately;

5.              examine the way languages are structured and used; 

6.              explain observations about the English language using linguistic categories and
            principles;

7.              practice the basic skills of linguistic analysis through independent field work;

8.              explore the structures of language through hands-on linguistic exercises in pragmatics,
            semantics, syntax, morphology, and phonology; 

9.              apply linguistic concepts and knowledge to the ESL classroom;

10.           explain particular linguistic observations in the ESL classroom;

11.           develop curiosity and awareness of various linguistic concepts;

12.           strengthen positive attitudes and sensitivity towards linguistic diversity; and

13.           appreciate the complexity of languages.

Required Texts:


American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed). Washington, DC: Author.
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. M. (2007). An introduction to language(8th ed.). Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Recommended Texts:

Harrison, K. D. (2007). When languages die. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 


Course Requirements and Evaluation:

Credit for Benchmark Performances will only be given if uploaded to Chalk and Wire by the required date.  Failure to upload by the required date will result in no credit and may result in a failing grade for the course.

See attached rubrics for all assignments. 

The following assignments are required of all course participants:

1. Online Blogging Assignment: Course participants are expected to
(1) Create their own linguistics blogs.
(2) Introduce themselves by writing their linguistic autobiography.
(3) Respond to assigned readings and videos.
(4) Discuss various linguistic problems related to second language teaching and learning.
(5) Respond to the teacher's postings and their group member's postings.  (25%)

2. Linguistic Research Paper: Teacher candidates will complete a field assignment that will   entail a comprehensive linguistic analysis of a five-minute long, videotaped, and transcribed segment of a selected television program. The instructor will provide detailed guidelines for this assignment. (2,750 – 3,000 WORDS)  *BENCHMARK (MUST BE UPLOADED TO CHALK&WIRE AND HANDED IN TO PROFESSOR)      (40 %)  

3. Elicitation Group Project: In groups, students will elicit linguistic information from one of the appointed speakers. This elicitation will be recorded.  Students will create a Prezi that includes the recording and is based on the speaker's responses and the group's research about the language. (25%)                        


4.  Attendance, punctuality, and active class/online participation.                                                        (10%) 

Select Bibliography

 

Altmann, G. T. M. (1997). The ascent of Babel: An exploration of language, mind, and understanding. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 
Blake, N. F. (1996). A history of the English language. New York: New York University Press.  
Brown, S., & Attardo, S. (2000). Understanding language, structure, interaction and variation: An introduction to applied linguistics and sociolinguistics for nonspecialists. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.  
Bryson, B. (1990). The mother tongue: English and how it got that way. New York: Avon Books.  
Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2003). Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer’s Guide, 2nd ed. Sydney: NCELTR/Macquarie University.
Chaika, E. (1994). Language: The social mirror. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.  
Chomsky, N., & Anshen, R. N. (1995). Language and thought. Wakefield, RI: Moyer Bell.  
Cooper, T. C. (1999). Processing idioms by L2 learners of English. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 233-262. 
Crain, S., & Lillo-Martin, D. (Eds.). (1998). An introduction to linguistic theory and language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Cross, J. B., DeVaney, T., & Jones, G. (2001). Pre-service teacher attitudes toward differing dialects. Linguistics and Education, 12, 211-227.

Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. New York: Cambridge University press.  
Cummins, J. (2001). Instructional conditions for trilingual development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 4(1), 61- 75.
Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: W. W. Norton.

De Mejia, A. (1998). Bilingual storytelling: Code switching, discourse control, and learning opportunities. TESOL Journal,7(6),  4-10.

Fabbro, F. (2001). The bilingual brain: Cerebral representation of languages. Brain and Language, 79, 211-222.
Farmer, A. K., & Demers, R. A. (1996). A linguistics workbook (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Finegan, E. (1999). Language: Its structure and use (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.  
Fromkin, V. A. (Ed.). (2000). Linguistics: An introduction to linguistic theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.  
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. M. (2007). An introduction to language(8th ed.). Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Frommer, P. R., & Finegan, E. (1999). Looking at languages: A workbook in elementary linguistics (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace. 
Genesse, F. (2001). Bilingual first language acquisition: Exploring the limits of the language faculty. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 153-168.  
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiesen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd ed.  London: Arnold.
Hollie, S. (2001). Acknowledging the language of African American students: Instructional strategies. English Journal, 90(4), 54-59. 
Hudson, G. (1999). Essential introductory linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.  
Kamii, C., Long, R., & Manning, M. (2001). Kindergartners’ development toward “invented” spelling and a glottographic theory. Linguistics and Education, 12, 192-210. 
Lieberman, P. (1998). Eve spoke: Human language and human evolution. New York: W. W. Norton.  
McCrone, J. (1991). The ape that spoke: Language and the evolution of the human mind. New York: William Morrow.  
Murray, D. Ed. (2000). Protean communication: The language of computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 397-421. 
Nakamori, T. (2002). Teaching relative clauses: how to handle a bitter lemon for Japanese learners and English teachers. ELT Journal, 56(1), 29-41. 
Nodelman, P. (2001). A is for…what? The function of alphabet books. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1, 235-253. 
O’Grady, W., Aranoff, M., & Dobrovolsky, M. (Eds.). (1998). Contemporary linguistics: An introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.  
Owens, Jr. R. E. (2007). Language development: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.  
Pennington, M. C. (1997). Phonology in language teaching: Essentials of theory and practice. In: K. Bardovi-Harlig & B. Hartford (Eds.). Beyond methods: Components of second language teacher  education (pp. 67-87). Boston: McGraw-Hill.  
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: HarperCollins.  
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: HarperCollins. 
Wardhaugh, R. (2005). An introduction to sociolinguistics (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.  
Wei, L. (2000). Types of morphemes and their implications for second language morpheme acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4(1), 29-43. 
Write, R. (2001). Adapting Grice’s maxims in the teaching of writing. ELT Journal, 55(1), 59-66.

Recommended Journals


Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
Applied Language Learning
Applied Linguistics
ELT Journal
English Today
Language
Language Learning

Language TeachingModern Language Journal
Modern Language NotesTESOL QuarterlyWorld Englishes

 

Recommended Web Sites

American Association for Applied Linguistics  www.aaal.org/
Center for Applied Linguistics  www.cal.org
Ethnologue: Languages of the World  www.sil.org/ethnologue/search
International Phonetic Association http://www.arts.gla.ac.uk/ipa/ipa.html
Linguistics Courses: Resources
Linguistic Society of America  www.lsadc.org
Roget’s Internet Thesaurus    www.thesaurus.com

Academic Integrity Statement:

The college maintains and affirms a strong policy of academic honesty.  Every member of the academic community has a duty neither to cheat nor to condone cheating, fabrication, plagiarism, or facilitation of academic dishonesty.  Academic infractions are subject to disciplinary action as described in the Graduate Education Student Handbook and the Molloy College Graduate Handbook and Calendar.

Plagiarism is claiming the words, ideas, concepts, outlines, handouts, and drafts of works-in-progress of another as your own without giving credit where it is due.  As a component of academic integrity, plagiarism is prohibited at Molloy College.  To prevent even the suggestion of plagiarism, quotation marks must be used to indicate the exact words of another author.  Additionally, each time you paraphrase another author [i.e., summarize a passage or rearrange the order of a sentence and change some of the words], you will need to credit the source in your text.

Adapted from Principle 6.22 of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.).

APA Manuscript Style:

All manuscripts in the field of education are written in the style format of the American Psychological Association.

Candidates in the Graduate Education Programs are required to purchase the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). (2010). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Attendance Policy: 

Since the classroom experience consists of an exchange of ideas and discussion which cannot be repeated, students are expected to attend all classes punctually and regularly.  Attendance and class participation represent 10% of a student’s final grade in all graduate education courses.  Students who are absent more than THREE times during the course of a semester will be assigned an Incomplete grade until the missed time and work is completed.  It is the student’s responsibility to contact the professor if there are any problems

As stated in the Molloy College Catalogue: 
The grade of “I” is earned in a course when the student has not completed all course  requirements.   It is a substitute grade given only with the approval of the instructor and Graduate Program Director at the specific request of the student prior to the end of the  course.  Approval is granted only when the student demonstrates circumstances beyond  his/her control which temporarily prevents completion of the course work.  All incompletes must be resolved by the dates indicated in the Academic Calendar for each semester.  Any extension beyond the published dates of the Academic Calendar requires written approval of both the instructor and the Director of the Graduate Program.  
Any grade of “I” which is not converted to a letter grade within the time allotted automatically becomes an “F.” 

Disabilities Statement:

Candidates with documented disabilities who believe they may need accommodations in this class are encouraged to contact the Director of the Disabilities Support Service Office, Casey Building, Room 11.  The telephone number is 678-5000, extension x6381 

Diversity Statement:

Diversity will be highlighted in this course in the following ways: 
1.     Course content and readings will focus on theoretical linguistics from the vantage point
      of the needs of a TESOL professional working with English Language Learners in the P-
      12 setting.
2.     Course participants will be given the opportunity to explore and reflect on the linguistic
       diversity in their own extended families.
3.     Participants will read and critique current research on issues such as first and second
language acquisition, bilingual first language acquisition, instructional conditions for trilingual development, and bilingual brain development.  
4.     Candidates will define what the practical implications of linguistic research articles are for
      the TESOL profession.  
5.     Language variation by geographic region within and outside the United States, as well as by
       age, gender, and professional affiliation will be explored.
6.     Candidates will examine their own attitudes towards language variation in the classroom.
7.     Candidates will develop and strengthen respect for, understanding of, and sensitivity toward
      linguistic diversity.

E-Mail Policy:

It is mandatory that every candidate have a Molloy College e-mail account and check it daily. Information re: the programs as well as communication from course professors utilize this media. This Molloy e-mail account must be activated immediately. If not utilized within 30 days, the account becomes defunct and needs to be reinstated.

E-Portfolio Account:   All Molloy teacher candidates must purchase an e-portfolio account through the Molloy bookstore.  All benchmark assignments must now be submitted electronically through e-portfolio as part of our assessment system.  Teacher candidates must keep an up-to-date portfolio, which will be used during each advisement session.

Information Literacy Statement:

Information literacy is a set of abilities requiring individuals to "recognize when information is needed and have the ability to locate, evaluate, and use effectively the needed information."
Information literacy also is increasingly important in the contemporary environment of rapid technological change and proliferating information resources. Because of the escalating complexity of this environment, individuals are faced with diverse, abundant information choices--in their academic studies, in the workplace, and in their personal lives. Information is available through libraries, community resources, special interest organizations, media, and the Internet--and increasingly, information comes to individuals in unfiltered formats, raising questions about its authenticity, validity, and reliability. In addition, information is available through multiple media, including graphical, aural, and textual, and these pose new challenges for individuals in evaluating and understanding it. The uncertain quality and expanding quantity of information pose large challenges for society. The sheer abundance of information will not in itself create a more informed citizenry without a complementary cluster of abilities necessary to use information effectively.
Information literacy forms the basis for lifelong learning. It is common to all disciplines, to all learning environments, and to all levels of education. It enables learners to master content and extend their investigations, become more self-directed, and assume greater control over their own learning.
An information literate individual is able to:
Determine the extent of information needed;
Access the needed information effectively and efficiently;
Evaluate information and its sources critically;
Incorporate selected information into one’s knowledge base;
Use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose; and
Understand the economic, legal, and social issues surrounding the use of information, and access and use information ethically and legally.
American Library Association. Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Final Report.(Chicago: American Library Association, 1989.)

This course will address Information Literacy in the following ways:  
Teacher candidates will read, summarize, critique, and present one recently published article to the class. They will prepare and distribute a two-page outline to all course participants. The articles will be concerned with the linguistic topics discussed in class and will be provided by the instructor or selected by the course participants.

Technology Statement:
Technology will be highlighted in this course in the following ways: 
1.              Websites related to linguistics will be accessed as sources of information on various linguistic topics discussed throughout the course.   
2.              Electronic journal articles will be used for article reviews and a linguistic research assignment.
3.              The Microsoft PowerPoint program will be utilized by both the instructor and the course participants to support oral presentations.
4.              Email correspondence and a message board specifically designed for the course and hosted on the Molloy College web server will be utilized to enhance communication among all course participants and the instructor. 
5.              As a subtopic of language processing, the language of computer-mediated communication will be explored.

Workshop Policy:

Attendance at Professional Workshops And Conferences:
Participation in professional workshops and conferences is an integral part of being a well informed teacher.  All teacher candidates are required to attend one Molloy College sponsored workshop/conference each semester.  These conferences are presented by Nassau Reading Council, Phi Delta Kappa, Molloy Chapter of Kappa Delta Pi, etc.
Workshops and Conferences which teachers are required to attend as part of their teaching contractual obligations (such as Superintendent’s Conference Days and district sponsored conferences) may not be considered to fulfill this Molloy College Professional Workshop/Conference requirement.  Workshops in Training in the Identification and Reporting of Child Abuse and Neglect, Principles of Chemical Dependency and School Violence Prevention and Intervention required by New York State Education Department for teacher certification do not fulfill this Molloy College requirement