EDU 540 Rubric: Linguistic
Research Paper* (40%) *BENCHMARK
|
Level3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
Transcription
S
(2 points)
|
Transcribes a 5-minute segment closely imitating actual
speech performance.
|
Transcribes a 4-5-minute segment somewhat imitating
actual speech performance.
|
Transcribes a less than 4-minute segment minimally
imitating actual speech performance.
|
Background
Information
K, S (2 points)
|
Provides comprehensive information about the linguistic
sample.
|
Provides adequate information about the linguistic
sample.
|
Provides minimal information about the linguistic
sample.
|
Linguistic Analysis
K,S,D, I
10 points
(2 per area of linguistics)
|
Examines 10-15 examples of language use. Selects 2-3
examples from at least 5 areas of linguistics. Carefully compares the
examples to Standard English Language use. Clearly identifies specific
knowledge ELLs need to have acquired to comprehend the selected example.
|
Examines 8-10 examples of language use. Selects 2
examples from 4 areas of linguistics. Adequately compares the examples to
Standard English Language use. Adequately identifies some specific
knowledge ELLs need to have acquired to comprehend the selected example.
|
Examines fewer than 8 examples of language use. Selects
fewer than 2 examples from fewer than 4 areas of linguistics. Minimally
compares the examples to Standard English Language use. Vaguely identifies
specific or general knowledge ELLs need to have acquired to comprehend the
selected example.
|
Discussion
6 points
K, S, D, I
(2 per questions)
|
Thoroughly discusses the implication of using TV as
language input for ELLs. Responds in depth to all 3 key questions on field
assignment handout.
|
Adequately discusses the implication of using TV as
language input for ELLs. Responds adequately to the 3 key questions on
field assignment handout.
|
Minimally discusses the implication of using TV as
language input for ELLs. Responds minimally to the 3 key questions on field
assignment handout.
|
Writing Style
K, S
(3 points)
|
Excellent writing that enhances the readability of the
paper. There are no errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar
|
Minor errors are present but they do not detract from
the readability of the project
|
Little or no evidence of correct writing. Multiple
errors seriously limit the project’s readability
|
APA Style
K, S(2 points)
|
Components of APA writing style are consistently evident
|
Components of APA style are addressed with minimal
errors
|
Components of APA style are used inconsistently
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment